Wild weather leads to Twitter cyclone after Saturday cancellation
AN interesting weekend of racing which should have been headlined by the Group Three Bletchingly Stakes, was instead hijacked by the cancellation of over half the card at the Melbourne venue of Caulfield.
Not only did it leave punters scrambling, but those watching Racing.com’s coverage were left empty handed given it was the only scheduled Victorian meeting for the day.
Hazardous weather conditions meant the horses and jockey’s safety was compromised and the meet was called off with five races remaining on the day.
Trainers and connections were mostly in support of the decision, and the Bletchingly will now be run in a week’s time at Sandown.
The Bletchingly Stakes will now be run under the same conditions at Ladbrokes Park Lakeside next Sunday 6 August.
— Melbourne Racing Club (@MelbRacingClub) July 29, 2017
While the key players were happy for the key fixture to be rescheduled, it is fair to say that social media was completely divided on the issue.
Let’s take a look at what the Twitterverse had to say.
Caulfield cancelled due Melbourne’s wild winds
To call the decision to call off Caulfield on Saturday divisive would be the understatement of the racing season.
Where the #$&! did everyone go? Got a moral in the next at Caulfield. @Caulfield #Caulfield @Racing #ifnotnowwhen? #horseracing pic.twitter.com/wKJbGa51kK
— Punting Dungeon (@PuntingDungeon) July 29, 2017
A number of punters were incredulous as to why it was called off.
https://twitter.com/MarkSaunders26/status/891152318070009856
While others believed the final winner of the day Saint Valorem made the most of the helpful conditions.
Awesome wind assisted, come from last win there from our Best Rough #Caulfield pic.twitter.com/eA246v4Hz5
— Turf Deli (@TurfDeli) July 29, 2017
The decision to call off the meeting was “not unanimous” but officials were satisified they made the right call.
The trainers, such as Mick Kent – who took in star sprinter Lankan Rupee into the feature – agreed the right call was made.
'I respect the decision. When the wind is moving the barriers, that's a cause for concern.' Trainer Mick Kent on Caulfield
— News Racing (@superracing) July 29, 2017
The punting public were mostly in disagreement.
One social media commentator described the call in an unfavourable way.
I'm sorry but this decision to abandon the Caulfield meeting is bloody weak! #HorseRacing #Caulfield
— Paul (@palkal03) July 29, 2017
While others bemoaned the fact the decision to call off the meet was not made earlier in the day.
This Twitter user could have saved some cash in the process.
https://twitter.com/owenklepzig/status/891153746268270592
The cancellation threw punter’s plans into disarray, and many were left looking elsewhere following Caulfield’s premature ending.
While others moved on quickly to the other spectactor sports that continued on in spite of the horrible Melbourne conditions.
Got through an abandoned meeting at Caulfield, now c'mon you Tigers!!
— TK (@Girl_GoesRacing) July 29, 2017
Others however, looked to the other race meets around the country.
Those who took on the quaddie at the Melbourne venue were hunting a new place to place their bets following the move.
Punters scrambling to get those Rosehill quaddies on ASAP. #Caulfield #Rosehill
— The Average Punter (@TheAvrgPunter) July 29, 2017
One social media lamented the fact he only did the form at Caulfield and missed other meets around the country.
Now I wish I'd done the form for Gosford. #Caulfield #scenes
— Billy J. (@BillyJTweets) July 29, 2017
A lot of people complained that the world has gone “soft”.
Do not call it off,it's only wind.Toughen up and get out there.If your allowed to say that these days.Society gone soft.
— Anthony whellum (@WhellumAnthony) July 29, 2017
This photo shows just how dangerous the winds were in the Victorian capital.
Nearly 1000 calls to SES for help in this wind.
Also:
• Power outages
• Caulfield races abandoned
• Brunswick tree down (pic: @_DannyRose). pic.twitter.com/BYD3YdeOiZ— 3AW Melbourne (@3AW693) July 29, 2017
We think it is easy to grandstand from the couch and question the reasoning behind the decision, but if jockeys and connections feel there is an additional risk of injury to both the riders and the horses then we see no other option.